KPK Needs Lifestyle Check
KPK Needs Lifestyle Check
A
A
A
JAKARTA - Leader candidate (Capim) Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is necessary to pass through check or checks lifestyle lifestyle a state official. This is done to see whether it is appropriate or not one's lifestyle with earned income.
This discourse raised one Capim Commission, Alexander Marwata. He considered, changing an order of life is not easy. Because it is necessary to find a formula to bear on how to jointly prevent corruption, because he saw Indonesia has a very long bondage of corruption, as a result of omissions is long.
''We must be aware if there is a neighbor or state officials who have a wealth of anomalies with income. Well ... it becomes a lifestyle check diagonsa beginning of irregularities when state officials have the wealth that does not comply with the income, '' said Marwata current feasibility study by the Commission III of the House of Representatives, at the Parliament Complex Senayan, Jakarta, Monday (14/12).
Why should community participation? Marwata explained, because if only rely on the Commission is clearly not possible. Thus, the reporting system needs to be built so that people can report such anomalies.
However, there should also be protection against the complainant or whistle-blower, when the report was not true, and there should be no sanctions. Rapporteur also need to be given incentives. During this time, when the complainant reported no corruption of Rp 1 billion, they only received Rp 3 million.
'' For me, 10 percent more feasible. Things like that so that people more involved in reporting criminal acts koruspi, '' said Marwata.
This discourse raised one Capim Commission, Alexander Marwata. He considered, changing an order of life is not easy. Because it is necessary to find a formula to bear on how to jointly prevent corruption, because he saw Indonesia has a very long bondage of corruption, as a result of omissions is long.
''We must be aware if there is a neighbor or state officials who have a wealth of anomalies with income. Well ... it becomes a lifestyle check diagonsa beginning of irregularities when state officials have the wealth that does not comply with the income, '' said Marwata current feasibility study by the Commission III of the House of Representatives, at the Parliament Complex Senayan, Jakarta, Monday (14/12).
Why should community participation? Marwata explained, because if only rely on the Commission is clearly not possible. Thus, the reporting system needs to be built so that people can report such anomalies.
However, there should also be protection against the complainant or whistle-blower, when the report was not true, and there should be no sanctions. Rapporteur also need to be given incentives. During this time, when the complainant reported no corruption of Rp 1 billion, they only received Rp 3 million.
'' For me, 10 percent more feasible. Things like that so that people more involved in reporting criminal acts koruspi, '' said Marwata.
(rnz)
Explore More